Did Saturday Night Live steal from Temple Horses?

Parallel thinking · 58% similar · 2011 → 2019

SNTH

The dog is watching

Saturday Night Live , compared with Temple Horses

Parallel thinking#36

Couples are put off having sex by their dog staring, and a mock ad sells a product that blocks the pet's view.

Their versionSaturday Night Live

Fake ad: couples bothered by watching dogs, solved with a dog-shaped tent. (paraphrase)

SNL — "Pound Puppy" (Don Cheadle episode), 2019▶ watch ↗

The originalTemple Horses

A 2011 fake ad for blinders that stop pets from seeing their owners have sex, with similar shots and dog breeds. (paraphrase)

YouTube sketch — "Pet Blinders", 2011▶ watch ↗

Why they're similar58%

Same embarrassing-dog premise and fake-ad format, but different gadgets, which makes this look most like parallel thinking.

  • Premise 34/40
  • Structure 16/30
  • Punchline 8/30
  • Premise34/40Both are fake ads selling a fix for dogs watching couples have sex.
  • Structure16/30Both follow the mock-ad shape of problem then product; the record notes similar shots and breeds.
  • Punchline8/30The products differ, a dog-shaped tent versus pet blinders, and no lines are on record.
Beat by beat
Saturday Night LiveTemple Horses

Setup

Couples are put off sex by their staring dogs.

=same

Setup

Pets watch their owners have sex.

Turn

A mock ad pitches a product to solve it.

=same

Turn

A mock ad pitches a product to solve it.

Punchline

The product is a dog-shaped tent.

≠different

Punchline

The product is blinders worn by the pet.

Scores and beats are our editorial reading of the public record, not a ruling.

Context

When and where

Temple Horses uploaded 'Pet Blinders' to YouTube in September 2011 (about 4,800 views by 2019). SNL aired 'Pound Puppy' in February 2019.

What followed

This was part of the same 2019 legal letter as the pumpkin sketch. NBC said its writers developed the idea independently, and since the gadget is different (a tent rather than blinders), the shared premise looks most like parallel thinking.

Every case links to public reporting. These are accusations and the record around them, not rulings. Bit descriptions are paraphrases, never transcripts.

All 45 cases